Monday, October 28, 2013

I want to thank Willam Ocasio, Kellogg professor of management and operations at Northwestern University, for saving me some money. He read my last post about my family's Blue Cross Blue Shield of MA plan under the Affordable Care Act and suggested that I could save "a lot of money" by choosing the $500/$1000 (individual/family) deductible plan instead of the plan with no deductibles.  It turns out that he is right, but it also turns out that I am still worse off than my current Massachusetts Connector plan. 

This BCBS plan under the ACA is about $350 less per month than the no-deductible plan.  Even if I run through the $1000 in deductibles during the course of the year, I break even after three months. Inexplicably, too, the visit and imaging co-pays are less than they would be in the ACA no-deductible plan.

But now, let's compare the ACA deductible plan to my current Massachusetts BCBS plan:


So, my initial point remains valid. I am still worse off under the Affordable Care Act than I was under the Massachusetts plan. My premium has gone up $220 per month (or 15%), and I will likely spend another $1000 covering the deductibles. My total percentage increase depends on how much additional care I need past my deductibles. Paradoxically, the more I need to use medical services, the smaller my annual percentage increase.

By the way, it is not clear to me how many people will have the time and inclination (and math skills) to compare the 95 plans on the Massachusetts exchange--but I guess I'm pleased that the data are available for all to see . . . including a helpful professor from Illinois!

Related Posts:

  • An unleashed demand for health care servicesIt slipped by so fast that I almost missed it.  It wasn't, after all, the main point of this news report by NPRs John Ydstie on All Things Considered.  It was on the economy as a whole.  Here's the audio record… Read More
  • Letting ideological purity stand in the way of common senseHealth care policy is rife with fads, unsupported and analytically flawed approaches to try to influence the way care is delivered with simple--but wrong--metrics used to determine unwarranted penalties.There, I've said it.&n… Read More
  • Spring cleaning over at the blogrollI spent some time cleaning up my blogroll (the list of blogs on the right side of this page.)  I deleted the ones that no longer link to a working website, that have been transformed into commercial enterprises, and that… Read More
  • It's working!We're so excited to be getting feedback on our job negotiation book.  Please consider buying copies for your own college graduate or others you know.  Here are two recent reviews.  The first deals with the gend… Read More
  • POTUS is the topic for TTHere my nomination for today's Throwback Thursday, a post from 2009 on medGadget.  Perhaps it strikes my fancy because of the uptick in health care expenses for the country:During Barack Obama’s healthcare reform tour, w… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts