Thursday, March 20, 2014

We've spent a lot of time recently focusing on how high-ranking people decided to let a private medical device company use the name and reputation of the University of Illinois in support of its product.

But there are smaller versions of this happening all the time.  These cases raise the same set of issues:  How can the public have trust that a doctor who has publicly endorsed a company or its products will use appropriate clinical judgment when caring for a patient?

I offer one recent example forwarded to me by a friend from Seattle, Washington.  On a Facebook post about the U of I, she asks:

How is this any different than my doctor having her endorsement on a medical equipment company's web site

Sure enough, we find the following endorsement:
Beyond that, we find that this same doctor participated in the product roll-out back in 2009:

"I use Smith & Nephew's hysteroscopic morcellator for all my polypectomy procedures, as do all of my colleagues," said Seine Chiang, M.D., Seattle, Wash. "The process of removing polyps has been greatly simplified with the TRUCLEAR System."

I have no reason to assume that Dr. Chiang is anything but a competent and caring doctor, but this kind of endorsement raises all kinds of questions.  Has she received financial support from this company, and, if so, has that been disclosed under the University's rules?  It is certainly not disclosed in these two examples.

Whether or not there was payment, she purports to represent the University of Washington in endorsing this product when she asserts that she and all of her colleagues use this equipment. The University's name is clearly set forth in this advertisement that is published and copyrighted by Smith and Nephew. Is Dr. Chaing authorized to represent her colleagues and the University?  If so, what approval process was followed to do so?

While not as egregious as the University of Illinois case, there are clear parallels.  Is anyone watching this at the University of Washington?  Is anyone watching this in similar cases throughout the country?

Related Posts:

  • Shelter in PlaceOne year later:  A few days after last year's Boston Marathon bombing, while the police and others were searching for the remaining suspect, the Governor asked people to "shelter in place," to stay at home and avoid bein… Read More
  • Meanwhile, south of the Massachusetts borderJust when I thought that Massachusetts health care environment was complicated, along comes this story from ConvergenceRI.  Richard Asinof is a tireless reporter who documents the health care comings and goings in the st… Read More
  • Berwick DID like the UK system after allIn a remarkable show of disinterest by the mainstream media in Massachusetts, it appears that only the Associated Press cared enough about Don Berwick's proposal for a single payer plan to give it the attention of a reporter.… Read More
  • Amazing. Miraculous. Groundbreaking. Incredible.Gary Schwitzer from HealthNewsReview.org makes this point on Twitter:A journalist must work hard to fit “amazing, miraculous, groundbreaking, incredible” into 1 robotic surgery story.He is referring to this piece on TheSpec.c… Read More
  • Acts of leadership and courage can be powerful forces for social changeTwo lovely articles crossed my desk, and I'd like to share them with you.The first is by Peter Pronovost, called "The ripple effect." Excerpts:Cornell University sociologists Milena Tsvetkova and Michael Macy explained how w… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts