Sometimes the irony of on-line advertising algorithms is made evident. How about this article in the New York Times--focused on the adverse impacts of hospital mergers--being tagged with an ad from Partners Healthcare System! ("We're rethinking health care," says the corporation. Are we convinced?)
Mores seriously, this article explains why Partners needed the buy-in from the Massachusetts Attorney General in the recently filed settlement of its anti-trust case: "State action" precludes a more thorough federal involvement. But the real question is why the federal government agreed to defer to the state in the first place, as opposed to pursing an FTC and/or DOJ case: Was this a favor from the Obama administration to their preferred Democratic candidate?
Mores seriously, this article explains why Partners needed the buy-in from the Massachusetts Attorney General in the recently filed settlement of its anti-trust case: "State action" precludes a more thorough federal involvement. But the real question is why the federal government agreed to defer to the state in the first place, as opposed to pursing an FTC and/or DOJ case: Was this a favor from the Obama administration to their preferred Democratic candidate?
0 comments:
Post a Comment