Wednesday, July 30, 2014

A friend of mine was excitedly discussing her job with a high-tech firm.  "Our meetings are so great and vibrant.  While the sessions are going on, we are all on our computers multi-tasking.  It's so efficient!"

Well, no.  There's a lot of evidence that constant interruptions do not improve efficiency and that they also impair quality.  Here's a recent example, published in Human Factors.  It focused solely on interruptions during the course of writing and concluded:

Our research suggests that interruptions negatively impact quality of work during a complex, creative writing task. 

Related Posts:

  • Add Beyond Heroes to your libraryI'm catching up on some great books people have been sending me.  Here's one by Kim Barnas, Beyond Heroes, which has the prosaic subtitle, A Lean Management System for Healthcare.Oh no, you say, another Lean hospital boo… Read More
  • You count!Yes, we know it's not legally effective.Yes, we know it will be described by the Coakley campaign and others as simply a political move by the Berwick campaign against the Coakley campaign.But, gee, it's the first time member… Read More
  • Stubborn facts create nightmaresWow, authors Al Lewis and Vik Khana (of Surviving Workplace Wellness fame) pull no punches with regard to some recent program announcements and analyses in this field.  You can read the whole story here, but the concludi… Read More
  • Sorry, Governor, but you are too lateA clip from the State House News Service:Patrick Weighs In On Coakley-Partners AccordGov. Deval Patrick said he wants “to be convinced” the agreement between Attorney General Martha Coakley and Partners HealthCare will bri… Read More
  • Admissions about readmissionsThe ever-thoughtful Brad Flansbaum presents a cogent summary of what we have learned and not learned about the causes of readmissions and the cost and benefits of reducing them.  I'll summarize briefly but then turn to t… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts