Wednesday, February 19, 2014

While the overall goals of the Affordable Care Act are spot on, there are various unintended consequences.  As the Administration tries to fix some of these, others are left standing.  I think what people find frustrating is that there seems to be little transparency about the process and the standards by which some changes are permitted and some are not.  As is often the case, complaints arise not so much because of the decision that is made as the process by which it is made.

An example concerns a request by Massachusetts, summarized in a recent blog post by the Associated Industries of Massachusetts:

Massachusetts employers are living through a twisted version of Cinderella in which the federal fairy Godmother helps everybody but the one who needs to get to the Ball.

The ACA limits to four the rating factors used to calculate small group health insurance premiums, while current Massachusetts law allows for additional consideration of factors such as industry, participation rate, group size, intermediary discount and group purchasing cooperatives.

Governor Deval Patrick requested a rating-factor waiver on September 3, noting that “a waiver of rating factor requirements will avoid increases in health insurance premiums for a large segment of our small-employer population and their employees.” Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius denied the request on September 26.

A study by health insurance companies indicates that the rating changes have raised or lowered rates for small companies by up to 57 percent, on top of average increases of 3.7 percent in their base insurance premiums.

The federal government has already granted more than 1,200 ACA waivers and made numerous administrative modifications to the law. Except on the rating factor issue.

Related Posts:

  • Every patient. Every day.It's been four years since I wrote about the spectacular (yes, spectacular) work being done by the hospitals in Ohio, where the slogan was, "We compete on everything, but we don't compete on safety."  In particular, the… Read More
  • The OAC progressesWe pause for this infrastructure break.  (Regular readers know that is one of my passions.)A new service is being constructed to connect Oakland Airport with the BART system, a vast improvement over the current arrangeme… Read More
  • When doctors refuse to hold their colleagues to accountA recent comment on Bob Wachter's blog caught me up short because of its obvious applicability to the situation at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System.Bob had written about the recent case involving… Read More
  • Five Days at Memorial: A different lessonSheri Fink says, "Emergencies are crucibles that contain and reveal the daily, slower-burning problems of medicine and beyond--our vulnerabilities; our trouble grappling with uncertainty, how we die, how we prioritize and div… Read More
  • Clinging stubbornly to an outdated IT enterprise modelSometime back, I compared the relationship between health systems and Epic, one of the biggest health care IT companies, to the Stockholm Syndrome.  To review:Stockholm syndrome, or capture-bonding, is a psychological ph… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts